跳至內容

用戶討論:Hereitisyesitis

頁面內容不支援其他語言。
維基百科,自由的百科全書
您好,Hereitisyesitis!歡迎加入維基百科!

感謝您對維基百科的興趣與貢獻,希望您會喜歡這裏。除了歡迎辭以外,也請您了解以下重要文章:

政策
政策
GNU
GNU
版權問題解答
貢獻內容必須是您所著或獲得授權
並同意在CC-BY-SA 3.0和GFDL條款下發佈
手冊
手冊
問號
問號
有問題?請到互助客棧詢問,或在我的對話頁提出。別忘記:討論後要簽名,方式之一是留下4個波浪紋「 ~~~~ 」。
If you have any questions about the Chinese Wikipedia, please leave a message here. Thank you for visiting!

-- Jimmy Xu 2022年4月19日 (二) 08:22 (UTC)[回覆]

2022年4月

[編輯]

Information icon 您好,感謝參與維基百科。惟閣下最近的編輯中有至少一項不具建設性且已遭回退。如閣下想進行編輯測試,請使用沙盒。如閣下有任何疑問,可以到互助客棧尋求協助。祝編安。 北極企鵝觀賞團留言2022年4月20日 (三) 02:59 (UTC)[回覆]

Yeah sure, thank you for your automated message that does not follow the situation. I made constructive edits while you have chosen to use this trash automated message sneering me as a new user who doesn’t know anything.--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:26 (UTC)[回覆]
You are welcomed to watch Arctic penguins, but stop these kind of spamming messages in my inbox thanks.--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:29 (UTC)[回覆]

Warning icon 請閣下停止作出擾亂性編輯。如果您繼續破壞維基百科,您將無法進行編輯。請勿為政治立場而進行破壞,請勿進行原創研究 not a User:慎言慎行老法師寫維基?寫個屁! 2022年4月20日 (三) 03:00 (UTC)[回覆]

All my analysis have sources proven below, if you think I am vandalizing you lack common sense.--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:27 (UTC)[回覆]

User:Hereitisyesitis的快速刪除通知

[編輯]

您好,有編者認為您創建的頁面User:Hereitisyesitis內容不當,符合快速刪除條件,該頁面很快會由管理員進行覆核並決定是否保留。
維基百科非常歡迎您的編輯,但請先看看編輯幫助維基百科不是什麼,以免犯了常見的錯誤

如果您想查看已刪除頁面的頁面內容,您可訪問已刪除內容查詢。如果您認為刪除不當,請到存廢覆核請求處提出申請,多謝合作!
幫助:互助客棧 · 刪除指導 · 存廢覆核請求 · IRC聊天頻道--北極企鵝觀賞團留言2022年4月20日 (三) 03:00 (UTC)[回覆]

Ok thanks for letting me know--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:31 (UTC)[回覆]

2022年4月

[編輯]
停止圖標
由於純粹破壞,您已被永久封禁
如果您認為有合理的理由可獲解封,請閱讀封禁申訴指導,然後在討論頁上的封禁通知下添加以下文字:{{unblock|您的理由 ~~~~}}。若您重新註冊賬戶使用匿名身份在討論頁申訴,會被視為繞過封禁發言,您用作申訴的賬戶亦會被封禁。 Mys_721tx留言2022年4月20日 (三) 03:06 (UTC)[回覆]

此用戶的封禁已被其他管理員複檢,申訴被拒絕。

請求複檢的理由或相關提問:

That's not vandalism, it is additional information I added to the page Zelenskyy. It may sound harsh, but that's the truth. There is no reason to block me as an innocent people who have done only 5 edits and 2 edits only to the page Zelenskyy even you think that's not appropriate. I have added my edit to that page below, check that for a reference. I am afraid I need to call Wikipedia 'censorhip' just like what China had done - my userpage is also deleted without appropriate reason! 'G3: 純粹破壞,包括但不限於明顯的惡作劇、錯誤信息、人身攻擊等' This is not a reason at all to delete my userpage. It's not personal attack, I am saying the fact that the United States earn the most in the whole war, which is analyzing, for false claims, can you please read what I have written at first? It's completely logical! If I want to vandalise, why don't I just add 'kjhfkjwdhfkjfjkdajkfh' to the page? What I said is logical and if you think that's what you call vandalism, you can leave Wikipedia at once as you don't have basic logical sense! I also ping the sysop here, everyone is now looking at your nonsense behaviour!

注意:

  • 濫用此模板或申訴渠道的用戶,可能被延長封禁或被禁止編輯其用戶討論頁。
    • 由於技術原因,如果啟用了「用戶討論頁上的結構式討論」功能的話,請將該請求放到討論頁主頁面的「關於此版塊」中,否則該請求無法顯示在請求分類中讓管理員留意到。
  • 如您希望與管理員就本次封禁作出討論,請於本模板外展開。

管理員已對此封禁決定作出複檢,並有以下結論:
經過檢查,管理員決定拒絕其解封要求。其他管理員可再複檢此用戶的封禁,但在沒有更好的理由前,請勿輕易推翻之前的決定。
  您顯然對於維基百科的規則缺乏最基礎的認識,我們不歡迎您在條目里發表無可靠來源支持、非中立的觀點,反覆加入是明顯的破壞行為。請自行閱讀維基百科不是什麼中立的觀點可供查證方針。
  處理人:--Kuailong 2022年4月20日 (三) 03:35 (UTC)[回覆]

此用戶的封禁已被其他管理員複檢,申訴被拒絕。

請求複檢的理由或相關提問:

Don't talk to me about neutral. It's all about common sense. What I added is analyzing how the United States benefited from the whole war. If you want sources, it's rather clear, for european countries, news had said that european countries not buying russian oils anymore, see here and the money goes to the US, see here. For Ukraine, here is the source of Ukraine buying weapons from the United States. For China, simply check out belt and road article from Wikipedia which Ukraine is part of it. For Russia, see here for source about Russian troops. For the GDP, russia's gdp in 2020 is about 1 trillion, while the US is about 20 trillion just check out the article of GD in WP. Anyway, even I didn't add sources, the block is not appropriate - I have added this thing to the page only 2 times and after 1 minute after the warning I have been blocked indefintely, saying me vandalise, which is too quick even I am wrong. As for my userpage deletion, it is completely not appropriate,and you have not answered my concern about the deletion and declined the block quickly just because you don't want to care about this, because you as an admin had been granted all the rights and you don't want to care anything for newbies, which is completely wrong.

注意:

  • 濫用此模板或申訴渠道的用戶,可能被延長封禁或被禁止編輯其用戶討論頁。
    • 由於技術原因,如果啟用了「用戶討論頁上的結構式討論」功能的話,請將該請求放到討論頁主頁面的「關於此版塊」中,否則該請求無法顯示在請求分類中讓管理員留意到。
  • 如您希望與管理員就本次封禁作出討論,請於本模板外展開。

管理員已對此封禁決定作出複檢,並有以下結論:
經過檢查,管理員決定拒絕其解封要求。其他管理員可再複檢此用戶的封禁,但在沒有更好的理由前,請勿輕易推翻之前的決定。
  毫無悔意,懂中文的情況下持續拒絕以中文溝通。
  處理人:AT 2022年5月8日 (日) 14:44 (UTC)[回覆]

@Mys 721tx I need you to explain the whole issue to me, adding contents without sources just because I am a new user should not be considered vandalism. And no warning is placed (yes it have but after 1 min of the warning I was blocked, which is too quick) so I know my problem. Please remove the block now.

Please check out WP:NOTVANDALISM which says that being non-neutral (which I forgot to add sources) is not vandalism - so the block is not appropriate. Check out WP:BITE also which says that 「 不應用封禁來當「見面禮」。請先盡力溝通。 」, so what you are doing is discouraging new users to join Wikipedia. —Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 08:19 (UTC)[回覆]

@Kuailong Please be responsible on this case instead of evading the problem.—Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:13 (UTC)[回覆]

I just realized that all of those called Chinese Wikipedia sysop is keep pushing and pushing responsibilities, probably that’s why Chinese Wikipedia is so heavily censored - Admins will only block, protect, rollback, accusing new users to violate 「which」 policy, and just remember all those policy so that they can use them to argue with others, and throw away requests for unblock, unprotect, unrollback, and stop playing with those funny policies for arguments. —Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月20日 (三) 09:20 (UTC)[回覆]

請使用標準漢語溝通

您好,當您參與討論時。您應該使用現代標準漢語和其他用戶進行溝通。如果您使用了現代標準漢語以外的其他語言發言,其他用戶可能因為看不懂您的發言而導致溝通不暢。如果您無法使用中文,請到這裏發言,謝謝。

Please always communicate in Modern Chinese

You have posted comments in a language other than Modern Chinese. To make your comments be comprehensible to the community at large, please always communicate in Chinese, no matter to whom you address your comments. If it's unavoidable to use another language, please provide a translation of the comments. If you do not write Chinese but need to contact zh-wikipedia, you can leave your message here. Thank you.

AT 2022年4月20日 (三) 14:40 (UTC)[回覆]

這個罐頭信息最後的連結對封禁用戶沒什麼用……
這位用戶,你第二次封禁申訴起筆就是「不要給我講中立」云云,再次體現了你對維基規則缺乏最基本的了解和尊重,這樣你是不可能被解封的。--Kuailong 2022年4月20日 (三) 14:46 (UTC)[回覆]
@KuailongAT I don't think I need to polite when I have been blocked for an inappropriate reason. I have read the policies of Wikipedia, can't you just check my appeal I have read your policies are find out that the being not neutral (I forgot to add sources) is not vandalism. Check out WP:NOTVANDALISM and WP:BITE. You have said that I keep adding the content to the page is vandalism, but in fact I have added that only 2 times, so not a violation of WP:3RR. Again, the block is too quick - after the warning I have stopped to add any contents to the page, but I still experienced a block, that is exactly biting new users. This inappropriate block should be removed in advance. Please unblock me now!--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月21日 (四) 01:17 (UTC)[回覆]
Typing chinese is really difficult so I am not gonna do this, just use google translate for my message.--Hereitisyesitis留言2022年4月21日 (四) 01:23 (UTC)[回覆]